Legal Opinion

Miles v. Walther

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 1876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: LeGuen v. Gouverneur, 1 Johns. 437; Goodrich v. City of Chicago, 5 Wall. 235; Bellinger v. Craigue, 31 Barb.- ; Baker et al. v. Cleveland, 19 Mich. 235 ; Aurora City v. West, 7 Wall. 82 ; Hoffer v. Allen, Law Bep. 2 Ex. 14 ; Fallon v. Manning, 35 Mo. 271; Frei Vogel, 40 Mo. 149 ; Dilworth v. McKelvey, 30 Mo. 149 ; Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville B. B. Co., 3 C. L. J. 174. cited: Seaman v. Luce, 23 Barb. 240; Ingersoll v. Van…

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: LeGuen v. Gouverneur, 1 Johns. 437; Goodrich v. City of Chicago, 5 Wall. 235; Bellinger v. Craigue, 31 Barb.- ; Baker et al. v. Cleveland, 19 Mich. 235 ; Aurora City v. West, 7 Wall. 82 ; Hoffer v. Allen, Law Bep. 2 Ex. 14 ; Fallon v. Manning, 35 Mo. 271; Frei Vogel, 40 Mo. 149 ; Dilworth v. McKelvey, 30 Mo. 149 ; Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville B. B. Co., 3 C. L. J. 174. cited: Seaman v. Luce, 23 Barb. 240; Ingersoll v. Van Bokkelin, 8 Cow. 670; Bussell v. Butterfield, 21 Wend. 300 ; Dilworth v. McKelvey, 30 Mo. 149.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, in their second amended petition filed herein, allege that plaintiff Mary C. Miles, on November 10, 1872, borrowed of defendant $83, for which she gave her note at three months to defendant, and also deposited with defendant, as collateral security for said note, a deed of trust of Bobert Patterson, together with two notes of said Patterson, secured by said deed, for $300 and $15 respectively, both to the order of said Mary C. Miles, said notes being dated July 7, 1871. In January, 1873, plaintiff Mary paid to defendant $57.50 on account of her note, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dilworth v. McKelvySupreme Court of Missouri · 1860

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tennent v. Union Central Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Standard Foundry Co. v. SchlossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API