Legal Opinion
Shearson Lehman Bros. v. M & L Investments
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 17, 1993No. Nos. 91-4206, 91-4217PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendants M & L Investments (“M & L”), Mike Strand (“Strand”) and Lois Strand appeal the district court’s restitution award of 40,000 shares of stock, 776 F.Supp. 1489 (D.Utah 1991). Plaintiff Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. (“Shearson”) cross-appeals the district court’s determination that Shearson’s Regulation T violation, 12 C.F.R. § 220.8, served as an affirmative defense against Shearson’s breach of contract action for stock nonpayment. We have jurisdiction over the appeal and cross-appeal1 under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
*1512M & L is a general partnership consisting of two…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Richard D. BENNETT and Carole A. Bennett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,710 Stanley S. Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Schulke Radio Productions, Ltd. v. Midwestern Broadcasting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. v. M & L InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993