Legal Opinion

Hume v. Town of Blackberry

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 21, 1985No. 84—0047PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE NASH

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs brought this action against defendants for declaratory judgment that the expense allowances paid to the township officers, without an accounting for expenses actually incurred, were contrary to law and sought reimbursement to the township of the sums so paid. The trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint and they appeal, contending the court erred in dismissing Howard Hume as a party plaintiff for lack of standing, and in determining, as a matter of law, that the expense allowances were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Fallon Development Co. v. City of O'FallonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Tanner v. SolomonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. McElhanon v. McElhanon ex rel. LeCompteIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Oliver v. OliverIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. DeSutter v. South Moline Township BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Avon v. GearyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. The City of Chicago v. Beythel Outcast ChurchAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API