Legal Opinion

Seaboard Finance Co. v. Barnes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1967No. Calendar 4, Docket 51,388, 51,389PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Kavanagh, J.

Plaintiff brought an action, labeled in the printed form of the summons as trespass on the case, in the Muskegon municipal court to recover from defendant Blair the balance on a $500 indebtedness. At the same time plaintiff instituted another suit to recover against defendant Barnes. The only difference between the two cases was the amount of advanced cash involved.

On November 12, 1959, plaintiff Seaboard loaned $500 to Blair, taking his promissory note therefor. On July 15, 1960, while current in his payments, Blair applied for and received an extension of credit on the balance due on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First Credit Corp. v. WellnitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Federal Finance Co. v. MerkelWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Findlater v. DorlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Seaboard Finance Co. v. BarnesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. McDonald v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. SchlossbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. In Re DannsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Household Finance Corp. v. DannsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. First National Bank Dayton v. Breen (In Re Breen)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
  5. Ramsey National Bank & Trust Co. v. Dammen (In Re Dammen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API