Eastern Brick & Tile Co. v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, and ORDER
DONALD RUSSELL, District Judge.
This is an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346 (b) and 2671 et seq.) and arises out of a collision between an engine operated by the defendant over a small spur line near Shaw Air Force Base and a truck and trailer, loaded with certain heavy material, owned by the plaintiff.
On the basis of the testimony taken on trial before me, I make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
In order to provide rail service to Shaw Air Force Base, the defendant maintains and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chisolm v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Robison v. Atl. Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- Jones v. Atlanta-Charlotte Air Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Seay v. Southern Ry. &8212 Carolina DivisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- Bishop v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Langley v. BoyterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Caldwell v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991