Sandwich Chef of Texas, Inc. v. Reliance National Indemnity Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FITZWATER, District Judge:
Fraud actions that require proof of individual reliance cannot be certified as Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(3) class actions because individual, rather than common, issues will predominate. The district court certified a nationwide Rule 23(b)(3) class in this RICO1 fraud action based on alleged overcharging of workers’ compensation insurance premiums. It did so by eliminating, on substantive grounds, plaintiff-specific issues of reliance and causation. We hold that the district court erred as a matter of law in doing so and thus abused its discretion in certifying this case as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Beck v. PrupisSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Catholic Healthcare West v. US Foodservice Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- McLaughlin v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Lynne A. Carnegie, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Household International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.