Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Scurry

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1996No. 96-525PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This court adopts the findings and recommendations of the board. Clearly, respondent’s alcoholism has caused him to neglect his duties to his clients and has adversely reflected on his fitness to practice law. However, we recognize, as did the board, that respondent has taken measures to resolve his problems.

Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the entire time stayed, provided that respondent adhere to the conditions of his two-year probation as set forth by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. ScurryOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. ScurryOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ScurryOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. ScurryOhio Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API