Legal Opinion

Clicquot Club Co. v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 3, 1926No. 2634PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action at law by petition to recover a certain sum which, the plaintiff says, was illegally exacted by the collectors of internal revenue in this district as beverage taxes claimed to be due under section 628 of title 6 of the Reverme Act of 1918 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 6163 %d).

The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss in the nature of a demurrer, on the ground that the facts set out in the petition do not entitle the plaintiff to recover.

*656The pertinent facts, briefly stated, are these:

The plaintiff is a corporation, engaged in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Waite v. MacYSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. International Railway Co. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. United Verde Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. American Express Co. v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. Hadley Falls Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API