Clicquot Club Co. v. United States
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action at law by petition to recover a certain sum which, the plaintiff says, was illegally exacted by the collectors of internal revenue in this district as beverage taxes claimed to be due under section 628 of title 6 of the Reverme Act of 1918 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 6163 %d).
The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss in the nature of a demurrer, on the ground that the facts set out in the petition do not entitle the plaintiff to recover.
*656The pertinent facts, briefly stated, are these:
The plaintiff is a corporation, engaged in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Waite v. MacYSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- International Railway Co. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. United Verde Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- American Express Co. v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Hadley Falls Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938