Legal Opinion

Dunnick v. Stockgrowers Bank of Marmouth

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1974No. 39080PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

This is an action to quiet title to accretion land along the Missouri River and in the City of Dakota City, Nebraska. The District Court quieted title in the plaintiffs to all the accretion land, except the extension of an alley and a road along the river bank. Title to the river road was quieted in the City of Dakota City. This appeal by plaintiffs involves only that road.

The accretion land here was originally platted as a part of the Village of Dakota City, and lies between block 273 and the Missouri River. Plaintiffs’ immediate *372predecessor in title acquired all of block 273 by deed dated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Game, Forestation & Parks Commission v. HullNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Parks v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  3. Wells v. TietgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kobayashi v. ZimringHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State ex rel. A.A.A. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Weiss v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Fischer v. Voldemars GrinsbergsNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Pascoag Reservoir & Dam, LLC v. Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API