Legal Opinion

Tillinghast v. McLeod

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 24, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Defendant’s petition for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDurfee, C. J.

This is a petition by the defendant for the new trial of an action on the case against him for libel. The action was tried in the Court of Common Pleas, where the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $300 damages. The grounds for a new trial alleged in the petition are first, that the court erred in some of its rulings in matter of law, and second, that the damages awarded are excessive. The writing complained of as libellous was contained in a letter written by the defendant, under date of June 27, 1889, to one S. E. Reynolds, and is set forth in the declaration with innuendoes in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Schermerhorn v. SchermerhornNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Stoughton v. MottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ventetuolo v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  2. Ponticelli v. Mine Safety Appliance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  3. Boston Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Albert A. VaroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
  4. Ventetuolo v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. Comfort v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API