Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Brady

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County

Decided July 24, 1939No. 433Published

1Dissent

Houck, P. J.,

dissenting. — Because of equal division of the court on the disposition to be made of relator’s demurrer to respondent’s answer, the demurrer stands overruled, with judgment entered for respondent. When the court is equally divided, the motion before the court falls: Madlem’s Appeal, 103 Pa. 584; or, as stated in Summers v. Kramer, etc., et al., 271 Pa. 189, 195:

“Ordinarily, when the sitting judges are equally divided as to the judgment or decree which should be entered, the motion or rule fails and an order is entered accordingly”.

I dissent from the judgment thus entered in this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Summers v. KramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Redstone Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Madlem's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  5. Branch Township School Directors' RemovalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API