Legal Opinion
Sher v. Pellicano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 4, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Brown, J.), entered January 31, 1991, as granted separate motions of the plaintiffs and the third-party defendant to dismiss the third-party complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
We reject the respondents’ contention that the appellant is precluded from bringing this appeal based upon…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bray v. CoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Covillion v. Town of New WindsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Calderon v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Minicozzi v. City of Glen CoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- Claude H. v. County of OneidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Spinner v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hazen v. DufraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Schwartz v. KurlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Spinner v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013