Legal Opinion

MENDOLA v. Sambol

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1950No. Appeals, 150 and 151PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The minor-plaintiff, a seven-year-old child, suffered serious injury from a gunshot Avound. The jury found that the injury Avas the proximate result of the defendant’s negligence and aAvarded damages in favor of the child’s parents to compensate them for hospital and medical expense incurred, and, in a second verdict against the defendant, made an allowance to the minor for pain and suffering. The lower court properly refused to enter judgments in favor of the defendant n. o. v. under the circumstances.

The verdicts establish these facts: Defendant had a .22 caliber…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Condel v. SavoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Archibald v. JewellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Loughlin v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Wassel Et Ux. v. LudwigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Fleming v. KravitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Ellis v. D'AngeloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Rubin v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Christiansen v. SilfiesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. K-Mart Enterprises of Fla., Inc. v. KellerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API