Legal Opinion

Slusher v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1982No. 3-381A84PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, Judge.

The appellants, husband and wife (Slush-ers) were the owners of an apartment house. Despite complaints and warnings about the deteriorated condition of the stairs and .landings which constituted the rear access to the apartments, Slushers did nothing substantial to repair or replace the stairs and landings although they indicated they were planning to install a metal unit.

On May 7, 1979, while a social guest of one of the third floor tenants, Laureen Olsen went out upon the rear porch of the apartment. When she leaned against the railing it gave way and she fell to the ground…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. SpectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Sumpter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Campins v. CapelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Rogers v. GrundenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Dawson Ex Rel. Dawson v. LongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Hodge v. Nor-Cen, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API