Legal Opinion
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. deJesus
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 19, 1972No. 71-127PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANN, Judge.
4.9 Violation of this [statute.] [ordinance] is negligence. If you find that a person alleged to have been negligent violated this [statute] [ordinance], such person was negligent. You should then determine whether such negligence was a legal cause of the flow] [injury] [or] [damage] complained of.
4.11 Violation of a traffic regulation prescribed by [statute] [ordinance] is evidence of negligence. It is not, however, conclusive evidence of negligence. If you find that a person alleged to have been negligent violated such a traffic regulation, you may consider that fact, together…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tamiami Gun Shop v. KleinSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Koonovsky v. QuelletteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Tampa Shipbuilding & Engineering Corp. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Richardson v. FountainDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Conroy v. BrileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DeJesus v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Brooks v. PlantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Baldridge v. HatcherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Wright v. City of St. PetersburgDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974