Legal Opinion

Foglesong v. Wickard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7684PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the White Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The appellee, as administrator of the estate of Daniel Foglesong, Sr., sued the appellant upon a promissory note made by the appellant to the deceased. Error is assigned upon the action of the court in sustaining a demurrer, for want of facts, to the fourth, fifth and seventh paragraphs of answer. These paragraphs are, in all essential respects, the same as the sixth, to which the demurrer was overruled. None of them show a complete defence to the entire cause of action, though pleaded as such, and the partial payments alleged in them were provable under the second paragraph, which is a plea…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. BartlettIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Fankboner v. FankbonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Odam v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1822
  4. Welshbillig v. DienhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Miller v. GoldthwaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hatton v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. McCarty v. WatermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API