Aesthetic & Reconst. Breast v. United Healthcare
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Jeffrey Alker Meyer, United States District Judge
It is a common practice for doctors and other medical providers to seek authorization from a patient's insurance company before agreeing to provide expensive medical care. As often as not, the provider contacts the insurance company and receives what it understands to be a pre-authorization. But sometimes the insurance company ends up deciding not to pay for what the provider thought was pre-authorized. So the question becomes whether the medical provider may recover in court against the insurance company.
That's essentially the question now…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Grand Juror Doe v. Wesley BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Abira Medical Laboratories, LLC v. Cigna Health And Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Adrian Alberto Osuna Gomez v. ICE Field Office Director and Facility AdministratorDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Anyanwu v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office DirectorDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
- Assemblage Entertainment PVT. LTD. v. 41 Entertainment, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.