Legal Opinion

Aesthetic & Reconst. Breast v. United Healthcare

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 12, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00608 (JAM)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jeffrey Alker Meyer, United States District Judge

It is a common practice for doctors and other medical providers to seek authorization from a patient's insurance company before agreeing to provide expensive medical care. As often as not, the provider contacts the insurance company and receives what it understands to be a pre-authorization. But sometimes the insurance company ends up deciding not to pay for what the provider thought was pre-authorized. So the question becomes whether the medical provider may recover in court against the insurance company.

That's essentially the question now…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Grand Juror Doe v. Wesley BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  2. Abira Medical Laboratories, LLC v. Cigna Health And Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  3. Adrian Alberto Osuna Gomez v. ICE Field Office Director and Facility AdministratorDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
  4. Anyanwu v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office DirectorDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  5. Assemblage Entertainment PVT. LTD. v. 41 Entertainment, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API