Legal Opinion

David E. Henderson v. Louis Milobsky

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 9, 1978No. 76-1726Published

1Opinion of the Court

595 F.2d 654

193 U.S.App.D.C. 269

David E. HENDERSON, Appellant,

v.

Louis MILOBSKY.

No. 76-1726.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued May 10, 1977.

Decided June 9, 1978.

Edward DeV. Bunn, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Francis L. Casey, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Terry Michael Banks, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before BAZELON, LEVENTHAL and ROBINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROBINSON.

Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge.

SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API