Legal Opinion
Wilmerding v. O'Brien
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Plaintiff taxpayer sues to nullify the appointment of defendant Francis X. McQuade as assistant corporation counsel of the city of New York and to temporarily and permanently restrain defendant Arthur J. W. Hilly, corporation counsel of that city, from continuing McQuade in the city employ, to restrain defendant comptroller from paying McQuade’s salary, and to enjoin the members of the board of estimate and apportionment from granting McQuade’s application for a retirement allowance under chapter 26 of the Greater New York Charter.
The bases claimed for the action are: That McQuade’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Claim of Marcellus v. Estate of MarcellusNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Nelson v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Culp v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- In re the Removal of Deuel from the Office of Justice of the Court of Special SessionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilmerding v. LaGuardiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934