Hellman v. Ladd
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
This is an appeal from an order quashing and setting aside service of process and dismissing a bill of complaint as to defendant Winkenweder & Ladd, Inc., an Illinois corporation.
Defendant Superior Piston Ring Company, a Michigan corporation organized in 1920, manufactures piston rings. In 1938 it entered into a sales contract with Winkenweder & Ladd, Inc. In this contract, Winkenweder was granted the exclusive right to sell the entire output of Superior on a commission basis. Following the outbreak of the war, practically all of Superior’s output was sold by Winkenweder to the Studebaker…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- A. Harvey's Sons Manf'g Co. v. Sterling Materials Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Watson-Higgins Milling Co. v. St. Paul Milling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Cheli v. Cudahy Brothers Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Bachler v. Maytag Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cooke v. YarringtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Higgins v. Hampshire Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
- K. Shapiro, Inc. v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957
- Donley v. Whirlpool CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1964
- Dolce v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.