Legal Opinion

Hellman v. Ladd

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1946No. Docket No. 31, Calendar No. 43,267PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

This is an appeal from an order quashing and setting aside service of process and dismissing a bill of complaint as to defendant Winkenweder & Ladd, Inc., an Illinois corporation.

Defendant Superior Piston Ring Company, a Michigan corporation organized in 1920, manufactures piston rings. In 1938 it entered into a sales contract with Winkenweder & Ladd, Inc. In this contract, Winkenweder was granted the exclusive right to sell the entire output of Superior on a commission basis. Following the outbreak of the war, practically all of Superior’s output was sold by Winkenweder to the Studebaker…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. A. Harvey's Sons Manf'g Co. v. Sterling Materials Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Watson-Higgins Milling Co. v. St. Paul Milling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Cheli v. Cudahy Brothers Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Bachler v. Maytag Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cooke v. YarringtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Higgins v. Hampshire Products, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. K. Shapiro, Inc. v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957
  4. Donley v. Whirlpool CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1964
  5. Dolce v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API