Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Gottlieb, Unpublished Decision (1-20-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 2000No. 76740Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

An accelerated appeal is authorized pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and Loc.App.R. 11.1. The purpose of an accelerated docket is to allow an appellate court to render a brief and conclusory decision.Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn. (1983) 11 Ohio App.3d 158.

Defendant-appellant Howard Gottleib, personally and d.b.a. Howard N. Gottleib Associates, appeals the decision of the trial court denying his motion for attorney fees as sanctions pursuant to R.C. 2323.51. The appellant requested sanctions against the plaintiff-appellee Dolores Gregory alleging frivolous conduct.

On June 26, 1997,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Dickens v. General Accident InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API