Legal Opinion

Claim of Roos v. Loft, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an award in favor of claimant. On February 16, 1934, claimant, while in the course of his employment as a chemical engineer by the employer, *843which was engaged in the manufacture of candy, ate some peanut butter which contained thallium sulphate which had been prepared as a rat poison, which was in a jar on a shelf in the laboratory of the employer’s plant where claimant was working. As a result he was poisoned and sustained the injuries for which the award has been made. The appellants assert that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of his employment and that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Miles v. Gibbs & Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Claim of Monaco v. Kesselman's Baby Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Matter of Groszek v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API