Legal Opinion
Neel v. Pippy
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 6, 2003No. 1:03-cv-00302PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCHWAB, District Judge.
I. Background
A. The Parties
On March 3, 2003, Plaintiffs Harry Neel, Robert T. Stevens and Mary Louise McDowell, all duly registered voters and electors in Pennsylvania’s 37th State Senatorial District (“37th District”), filed a verified complaint, motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, and brief in support of motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against defendants John R. Pippy, the Friends of John Pippy, his political campaign committee, Benjamin Ramos, acting Secretary of the Department of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Corzine v. 2005 Defense Base Closure & Realignment CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005