Bluthenthal & Bickart v. Silverman
Supreme Court of Georgia
Garnishment' — certiorari. Before Judge Reese. Elbert superior court. March 17, 1900.
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
The plaintiffs sued out an attachment against Jake Silverman, and in aid thereof had a summons of garnishment issued against Mrs. S. Silverman. The garnishee answered not indebted, and this answer was traversed hy the plaintiffs. Upon the trial of the case before a jury in a justice’s court it appeared that the defendant had sold to the garnishee a stock of goods for a certain amount, receiving a portion thereof in cash, and leaving the balance in the hands of the garnishee for the purpose of paying off the defendant’s indebtedness to certain creditors. Such creditors were not parties to this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mayer & Lowenstein v. Chattahoochee National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- Trustees of Howard College v. PaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Wimberly v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Cox v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Martin v. CopelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McIntire v. RaskinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Jackson v. GallagherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- American Surety Co. v. Bank of DawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Wade v. City and County BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Bostwick Supply Co. v. Hodgson Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.