Legal Opinion
Ex parte Schorer
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 10, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On petition by Michael Schorer for a writ of habeas corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
GEIGER, District Judge.
On May 8th Michael Schorer filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus to test the legality of his detention by the United States marshal of this district.
The petitioner and one Hans Boessl were arrested in November, 1911, as alleged fugitives from justice from the kingdom of Bavaria, charged with the crimes of forgery and the utterance of forged acceptances or bills of exchange. They were committed to jail; but subsequently discharged because the United States commissioner entertaining the proceedings had not been authorized to act as an extradition commissioner.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grin v. ShineSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Benson v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Glucksman v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Commonwealth v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- In Re KaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John Peter Galanis v. Ermen Pallanck, U.S. Marshal for the District of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States Ex Rel. Karadzole v. ArtukovicDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
- United States v. GalanisDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Voloshin v. RidenourCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924