Legal Opinion

Crooks v. Murrows Transfer Inc

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided April 13, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00263Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION RUTH CROOKS and WANDA ) MALCOM, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action Number ) 2:22-cv-00263-AKK v. ) ) MURROW’S TRANSFER, INC., ) and BRADLEY POWELL, ) ) Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Murrow’s Transfer, Inc. removed this action on grounds of diversity jurisdiction. Doc. 1. Now before the court is Ruth Crooks’ and Wanda Malcom’s motion to remand, doc. 5, in which they argue that Murrow’s Transfer fails to establish the requisite amount in controversy or, at the least, untimely filed its notice of removal. For its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Jacqueline Burns v. Windsor Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Katie Lowery v. Honeywell International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Andrew Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API