People v. Nunez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VEGAN, J.
This appeal concerns the M’Naghten insanity test (M’Naghten’s Case (1843) 10 Clark & Fin. 200, 210 [8 Eng. Rep. 718, 722]) and the Legislature’s proscription against multiple punishment as specified in Penal Code section 654.1 This is an intersection that legal scholars may find interesting. If a defendant has been convicted of multiple offenses but was legally insane at the time of the offenses, how does a sentencing judge or an appellate court determine his “intent and objective” in setting a maximum period of potential confinement? Such a defendant is incapable of knowing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Clark v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- People v. TriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. CorreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- In re Isabella C. CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Butts CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- People v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.