Legal Opinion

Countywide Heating & Cooling, Inc. v. Horton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1982No. 1182PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, P.J.

Plaintiff-appellant, Countywide Heating and Cooling, Inc., appeals the trial court judgment finding that William C. Horton, d.b.a. Countywide Heating & Cooling, has a legally protected interest in the trade name “Countywide Heating & Cooling” and permanently enjoining appellant from using said name. We reverse.

Facts

Appellee is a sole proprietorship which installs and services heating and air conditioning equipment under the name “Countywide Heating & Cooling.” Ap-pellee commenced his operation in May 1976. Appellant is an Ohio corporation established March 15,1979, to install and service…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cincinnatus Assn. v. Cincinnatus PartyOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mead Corp., Diconix, Inc., Successor v. LaneOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Hinckley Chamber of Commerce v. Hinckley Chamber of Commerce, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Chinn v. ChinnOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Hildawn Design, LLC v. Right Here at Home, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API