Legal Opinion

Lowes v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn H. Doerr, J.

The defendant moves pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7), to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

It is conceded by the defendant that by such attack the allegations as set forth in the complaint are presumed to be true.

From the complaint it appears that Goodbody & Co., Inc. (Goodbody) was a stockbrokerage firm that has, since the events in question, merged with defendant. As a result of that merger, the defendant assumed the contractual obligations and liabilities of Goodbody.

On January 5, 1971, Goodbody received and certified the signature of plaintiff on 100…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  2. Love v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dudley v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Conroy v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API