Charles Baumbach Co. v. Singer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Milwcmhee County. Garnishment. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The garnishee appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtWiNslow, J.
The respondent is a judgment creditor of the firm of Schwartz & Co., and sued out garnishee process against Singer, who is the assignee of said firm under a *330voluntary assignment. It appeared, without dispute, that the court commissioner who took the bond of thé assignee failed to indorse thereon his approval thereof. Upon this ground, the trial court held the assignment void and the garnishee liable. This exact question was decided in Shakman v. Schlueter, 77 Wis. 402, and upon the reasoning and authority of that case it is apparent that the judgment of the trial court was right.
After the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shakman v. SchlueterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Vandenhouten v. VanhuseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Bertrán de Picardo v. DomenechSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935
- Cowen v. State ex rel. DonovanOhio Supreme Court · 1920
- de Picardo v. DomenechSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935