Legal Opinion

State of Maryland v. Branch Motor Express Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1953Published

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Plaintiffs seek to strike out as sham and frivolous (Rules Civ. Prac., rules 103,104) certain denials which the corporate defendant has interposed to the amended complaint. Specifically, plaintiffs move to strike out the denials of paragraphs “First,” “Second,” “Third,” “Ninth” and ‘' Twelfth ’ ’ of plaintiffs ’ pleaded first cause of action and the same denials where the answer repeats them as to other pleaded causes of action (answer, par. “ Sixth,” “ Seventh,” “ Fourteenth ” and “ Nineteenth ”).

Plaintiffs’ intestate, Joseph D’Agostino, met his death as a result of an automobile accident on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kay v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Pfleuger v. PfleugerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Read v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Cunningham v. . DadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Kerfoot v. KelleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API