Legal Opinion

Eshleman v. Keenan

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 8, 1936PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bill for Accounting. The complainants and others who have intervened as complainants,

are stockholders of the defendant, Sanitary Company of America, hereinafter referred to as Sanitary. The bill was filed by them in their derivative right as stockholders. The relief it seeks is in behalf of Sanitary. The relief sought is a return to the corporation of the sum of $28,800.00 and interest, which it is charged was wrongfully appropriated from the treasury of Sanitary in payment for alleged management fees to the defendant, Consolidated Management Corporation, hereinafter referred to as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Brewer v. Proprietors of the Boston TheatreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Lofland v. CahallSupreme Court of Delaware · 1922
  4. Cahall v. LoflandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
  5. Matthews v. Headley Chocolate Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  2. Loft, Inc. v. GuthCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1938
  3. Mayer v. AdamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Potter v. Sanitary Company of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1937
  5. Mayer v. AdamsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API