Legal Opinion

Macris v. Matta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, as they have no affirmative duty to remedy a natural condition on their property such as the beaver dam at issue here (see Vanderwiele v Taylor, 65 NY 341 [1875]; Frank v Garrison, 184 AD2d 852 [1992]; Lichtman v Nadler, 74 AD2d 66 [1980]). In response to this showing, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Hilltop Nyack Corp. v TRMI Holdings, 272 AD2d 521 [2000]; cf. Higgins v…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vanderwiele v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Higgins v. Village of Orchard ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Hilltop Nyack Corp. v. TRMI Holdings Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Lichtman v. NadlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Frank v. GarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sunlight Clinton Realty, LLC v. Gowanus Indus. Park, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API