Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. . Haggard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Civil ACTION, tried before Graves, J, at Spring Term, 1888, of Bertie Superior Court Motion by appellant for a certiorari. Motion by defendant to dismiss the appeal. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Ct.a-r.ic, J.:

The counsel below in this case signed the following agreement: “It is agreed that plaintiff may have thirty daj's to ñle his case on appeal from the adjournment of Court, and the defendant thirty days thereafter, May 5, 1888 ” The Court adjourned on that day. The appellant served his case on appellee b-tween May the 12th and 15th. The appellee’s counsel files an affidavit that he served his counter-case on appellant’s counsel on -June the 25th, alleges that no application has ever been made to the Judge to settle the case on appeal, and thereupon asks to dismiss the appeal, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Russell v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Doe on the Demise of Kirkman v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Howard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Sondley v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. State v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  4. Arrington v. . ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API