State v. Smith
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Chief Justice.
Defendant’s appeal of his robbery conviction asserts the trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial after striking evidence of victim’s viewing of him in the absence of counsel shortly after the robbery. The primary question is whether defendant’s constitutional right to counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution was under the facts here violated. We hold it was not.
We briefly summarize the facts as diclosed by the record. About 2:30 a. m. February 22, 1968 a blue and white Rambler was driven into and parked near the front door…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. IndrelunasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bobby Russell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- State v. SalazarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1986
- Williamson v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.