Watts v. Magic 2 x 52 Management, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] The plaintiffs (“Limited Partners”), a majority of the limited partners of Magic 2 x 52 Limited Partnership (“Magic Partnership”), appeal from an order denying their post-judgment motion to pierce the corporate veil of several corporate defendants and to recover punitive damages. Because the Limited Partners’ post-judgment motion did not seek to reopen the final judgment entered in this case under either N.D.R.Civ.P. 59 or 60, we conclude the district court did not err in denying the motion. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In 2007, the Limited Partners began this derivative action…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Jablonsky v. KlemmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Rummel v. RummelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Hilzendager v. SkwarokNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Hamilton v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson v. BronsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- PHI Financial Services, Inc. v. Johnston Law Office, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Solid Comfort, Inc. v. Hatchett Hospitality Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Taszarek v. Lakeview Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Interest of S.R.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.