Legal Opinion

Frank v. Tewinkle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 2012No. 1142 WDA 2011PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

OLSON, J.:

In this consolidated appeal, Appellant, Alan Frank, appeals from the trial court orders entered June 21, 2011, sustaining the preliminary objections filed by Appel-lees, James J. Stuczynski and Bruce W. Bernard, and the preliminary objections filed by Appellees, Laurie C. TeWinkle and Anthony J. Sciarrino. For the following reasons, we affirm.

The trial court summarized the applicable factual and procedural background of this matter as follows:

The instant matter stems from two separate lawsuits filed by [Appellant], both alleging breach of contract. [Appellant] admits to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Richette v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Belfonte v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Heldring v. Lundy Beldecos & Milby, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. WFIC, LLC v. LaBarre, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Riffin v. Consol. Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Crider, C. and D. v. Bland, T. and Kipe, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Grimes, F. v. Polymer Dynamcis, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API