Ex Parte Kaufman
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Dissent
ROBERTS, J. (dissenting).
SDC 34.1707 provides that “If the Governor shall decide that the demand should be complied with, he shall sign a warrant of arrest * * *; and the warrant must substantially recite the facts necessary to the validity of its issue.” It would appear that this section intends a recital in substance of jurisdictional facts referred to in SDC 34.1703, which reads as follows: “No demand for the extradition of a person charged with crime in another state shall be recognized by the Governor unless in writing and accompanied by a copy of an indictment found or by an information…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wells v. HanleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- State ex rel. Nisbett v. TooleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Ex Parte CuppCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- In re Extradition of SandersOhio Court of Appeals · 1937