Legal Opinion

Paton v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 2011No. H034618PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Eric Patón, on behalf of himself and a class of others similarly situated, sued his former employer, defendant Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., alleging that defendant had failed to pay him for an eight-week sabbatical he had earned but not used by the time he resigned. Under defendant’s sabbatical policy, salaried employees with seven years of service were eligible for an eight-week fully paid sabbatical. The leave was forfeited if the employee did not use it before employment terminated.

*1511Plaintiff claimed that defendant’s sabbatical program was really…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Farm Raised Salmon CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Binder v. Aetna Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fisher v. PayFlex Systems USANebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Karen Hartstein v. Hyatt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. McPherson v. EF Intercultural Foundation, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API