Legal Opinion
Clairol, Inc. v. Kingsley
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 16, 1970PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
109 N.J. Super. 22 (1970)
262 A.2d 213
CLAIROL, INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM KINGSLEY, ACTING DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 23, 1969.
Decided February 16, 1970.
Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and KOLOVSKY.
Mr. Roger C. Ward argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Kipp, attorneys).
Mr. Charles H. Landesman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Deputy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Livingston & Gilchrist v. Maryland InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- City of Newark v. FischerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. William Wrigley, Jr., Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- General Trading Co. v. Taxation Div. DirectorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Heublein, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Clairol, Inc. v. KingsleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.