Legal Opinion

Connell v. Shanafelt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 1969No. 17050PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

Arthur Shanafelt as plaintiff brought suit in the County Court against Jack Con-nell, Jr., as a defendant, for an indebtedness amount within the jurisdiction of said court and below the jurisdictional amount of the District Court. However, in addition thereto but founded upon the indebtedness sued upon, plaintiff also alleged that he had acquired a statutory mechanic’s and materialman’s lien, and sought in said suit to have lien on an interest in realty established and foreclosed. Judgment in the case ignored any lien or foreclosure and was personal merely, for an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crowell v. MickolaschCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Harris County Inv. Corp. v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conger v. DalrympleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API