Legal Opinion
Akrie v. Grant
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 23, 2013No. Nos. 68345-4-I; 69300-0-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.
¶1 Volcan Group, Inc., d/b/a NetLogix, and Scott Akrie, chief operating officer of NetLogix (collectively *508Akrie), sued James Grant, Cassandra Kennan, Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP, Seattle Deposition Reporters, and T-Mobile (collectively Grant) for violation of the privacy act.1 Grant moved to strike the claims under the antiSLAPP2 statute3 and moved to dismiss the suit. The trial court held that the anti-SLAPP statute applied to Akrie’s claim, granted the motion to dismiss, and awarded statutory damages of $10,000 plus attorney fees to Grant. Grant appeals, asserting that the trial court erred…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burson v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Davis v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Alaska Structures, Inc. v. HedlundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Akrie v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Baseball Club v. SDL Baseball Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Akrie v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.