Legal Opinion

Shelton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1963No. 35212Published

1Opinion

ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

McDonald, judge.

This cause was reversed for improper j'ury argument.

The State points out in its brief that Presiding Judge Woodley is committed to the proposition that such complaint to argument is not properly before this Court unless certified by the trial court. Judge .Woodley’s views are reflected in: Kinnebrew v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 198, 324 S.W.2d 554; Wells v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 228, 324 S.W.2d 860; Lookabaugh v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 613, 352 S.W.2d 279; Scott v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 237, 340 S.W.2d 52.

The State also points out in its brief that Judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kinnebrew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Lookabaugh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Wells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API