Legal Opinion

The Pajala

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 29, 1934No. Nos. 13989, 14002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BYEBS, District Judge.

These causes have to do with the furnishing of fuel oil by the libellant to the vessels named, under a contract with a time charterer, and the questions for determination are whether a lien existed, and if so, whether it has been lost. There are no contested issues of fact.

In the Pajala ease the circumstances were these: On July 21, 1931, the ship was chartered in London by its owner (the claimant corporation) to Canadian-American Shipping Co., Ltd., apparently a Canadian corporation of Vancouver, B. C., on time charter (government form) and she continued thereunder…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Board of Trade of Chicago v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Lucas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. The KateSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. W. A. Marshall & Co. v. S. S. "President Arthur"Supreme Court of the United States · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dampskibsselskabet Dannebrog v. Signal Oil & Gas Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API