Legal Opinion

Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Stuart

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1942No. 28346PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

The policy sued on provided: “This entire policy shall be void, unless otherwise provided by agreement in writing added hereto, if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership.” The Supreme Court has held in answer to a certified question that the policy sued on was an entire one. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Co. v. Stuart, 191 Ga. 745 (14 S. E. 2d, 98). To a second certified question the Supreme Court answered that its answer to the first certified question does not preclude us from passing on the question of “de minimis non curat lex.” Liverpool &…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Orient Insurance v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Williamson v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Randle v. Stone & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. National Life & Accident Insurance v. FalksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Peoples Credit Clothing Co. v. Old Colony InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. JessupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Allstate Insurance v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API