Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bernals, Inc. v. Kessler-Greystone, LLC

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 2011No. 1091121Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCobb, Chief Justice

When this Court decided Cadle Co. v. Shabani, 4 So.3d 460 (Ala.2008) (“Cadle ”), Justice Murdock wrote a powerful dissent. See Cadle, 4 So.3d at 463 (Murdock, J., dissenting). I concurred in the result in Cadle, with the following special writing:

“Under other circumstances, I would find Justice Murdock’s dissent persuasive, particularly with respect to the savings in judicial resources that would be effected if the filing and prosecution of an entirely new legal action could be avoided. However, under the circumstances of this case, it does not appear to me that the jurisdictional impediment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. ShabaniSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. The Cadle Co. v. ShabaniSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Lauterbach v. Gordon, Dana, Still, Knight & Gilmore, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API