Legal Opinion

Norris v. Tearney

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1993No. 01826PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying Robert and Jackie Norris, appellants-grandparents, visitation with their grandson, two-year-old Damien Tearney. We agree that visitation would interfere with the parent-child relationship under the facts of this case, and therefore, affirm.

Appellants’ son, Robert Norris, and appellee, Lisa Tearney, met and began a relationship while both were hospitalized for depression in the psychiatric unit of a local hospital. Shortly after the relationship began, appellee became pregnant, and within a few months, Robert ended the relationship.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spriggs v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. McMillen v. McMillenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Karis v. KarisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Mumma v. MummaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Argenio v. FentonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Troop v. Troop, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1996
  3. West v. West, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API