Legal Opinion · Dissent

Charles Ruppman Advertising, Inc. v. Manhattan Life Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 16, 1968No. Gen. No. 68-27Published

1DissentAlloy, P. J.

I cannot concur in the majority opinion in this cause. I feel that this is a case which is essentially one of a determination by the trial court of disputed factual issues. The first question is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the finding by the trial court that there was either an express or implied waiver by Manhattan of the condition of its policy requiring prepayment of its initial premium. It is true, as appellee contends, if the trial court was correct in finding such waiver either express or implied, that plaintiff is entitled to recover on such theory alone. It also…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. SchlinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. A-1 Cleaners & Dyers ex rel. Sheldon v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  3. Hooker v. Farmers Mutual Reinsurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API