Bishop v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Following a negotiated plea agreement, defendant was convicted of dealing in stolen property and grand theft, and received concurrent split sentences of three years incarceration followed by two years probation. Costs and restitution were imposed as special conditions of defendant’s probation. The costs were imposed without adequate notice or opportunity to object and therefore must be stricken. See Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Clark v. State, 560 So.2d 264 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
Because defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Harriel v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Dickens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.