Legal Opinion

Jose Able Fierro v. Roger Crist Attorney General of the State of Arizona

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1994No. 93-16058Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

39 F.3d 1186

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Jose Able FIERRO, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Roger CRIST; Attorney General of the State of Arizona,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 93-16058.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 1994.

Decided Oct. 28, 1994.

Before: SKOPIL, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM*

2

Jose Able Fierro appeals the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Talal B. Jammal v. John K. Van De Kamp, Attorney General of the State of California Superior Court of the County of Contra CostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. State v. PereidaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API